iePolitics: Lack of BOS commitment to residents shows again

The Press Enterprise’s article on county redistricting should be entitled, “The tale of two counties.”  It certainly illustrates one board of supervisors in control and one that is not.

In Riverside County, a committee to address redistricting was created last September. It will be meeting Tuesday to discuss the new census data.  The county also has a website up and running, www.rivcoredistricting.org to keep residents informed of the process.

Continue reading

PE: RIVERSIDE COUNTY: Potential ballot measure would reduce supervisor pay

By PE Politics on February 4, 2011 4:52 PM

Herb Higgins, a former Norco councilman, filed a notice of intent this week to gather signatures for a measure to reduce the pay and benefits of Riverside County supervisors. Higgins unsuccessfully challenged Supervisor John Tavaglione in the June 2010 election.

Continue reading

InlandPolitics: Riverside County supervisors rake in the campaign cash

  • Written by Administrator
  • Posted February 4, 2010 at 3:55 pm

The campaign finance disclosure statements for members of the Riverside County Board of Supervisors show healthy sums for all members with the exception of Jeff Stone who is seeking state legislative office.

Here is the annual summary for all five supervisors who collectively raised $ 1,048,448.90 in 2009.

Excellent job in a poor economy.

SUPERVISOR           CONTRIBUTIONS   EXPENSES      CASH ON HAND

Bob Buster           $ 250,453.25    $ 215,632.20  $ 167,261.80
John Tavaglione*     $ 138,555.00    $ 244,672.73  $ 421,458.13
Jeff Stone           $  66,575.00    $ 122,667.62  $   1,035.02
John Benoit*         $ 342,412.44    $  65,493.13  $ 288,023.95
Marion Ashley*       $ 250,453.25    $ 215,632.20  $ 167,261.80

* Candidate for election or re-election in June 2010

Source: Riverside County Registrar of Voters

Unlike their San Bernardino County brethren, the Riverside County bunch seems to be a little more frugal with their cash spending habits.

A brief review of the expenditures revealed no payments to criminal law firms.