iePolitics: Voting for Christians – Updated

Several of our local candidates have received the endorsement of the Election Forum.  Here is a little bit from their website:

Election Forum
Tell a friend election forum

As a Christian, you need to know about the California June Primary candidates and propositions from a Christian worldview.

Helping Christians vote for, not against, their Biblical values

Thank you for visiting ElectionForum.org. The purpose of this website, along with our Reality Alert newsletter and our Community Election Forums in churches, is to help Evangelical Christians vote their values.

Among our local candidates to receive their endorsement:


District Attorney – Frank Guzman

Frank H. Guzman


Sheriff -  Paul Schrader

SHERIFF PAUL SCHRADER 2ND AMENDMENT SHERIFF


63 Assembly District – Mike Morrell

4th Supervisorial District

Not pictured (because they haven’t sent us one):

Scott Folkins

Janice Rutherford

Ensen Mason

Dennis Draeger

Gary Thomas

Victor Stull

James Hosking

2 thoughts on “iePolitics: Voting for Christians – Updated

  1. How did they jump to the conclusion and endorse Vic Stull?

    The California election forum courageously went against Ramos and Hoops then endorse their wing man.
    (Note who threw all of Stull’s campaign fundraisers)

    I am happy to see that the usual San Bernardino scorecard was not endorsed but yet again political groups are rubber stamping judges without looking into their qualifications or commitment to the community.

    Paul Schrader is a great endorsement for sheriff he lives his Christian values and is in his race to make the community a better place.

    The guide went against Lemkau as expected – but then endorse the guy with his identical experience – Vic Stull. If you like Lemkau you will LOVE Stull.

    What would Jesus do? Would he sit at home expecting votes, or would he go out into the community?

    I believe that Jesus is on the side of children first and would want them protected and families assisted to care for each other.

    Not all candidates were contacted by this forum. Ed Montgomery was never contacted.

    There is plenty to share about Christian values to go around in the race for seat #29 starting with helping thy neighbor.

  2. While I’m very happy for those have been endorsed, I’m very dismayed that my candidate was not even given the opportunity to participate. Mr. Montgomery was never contacted by Mr. Huey and his organization. We would have welcomed to chance to compare Christian values.

    Mr. Montgomery married for almost 20 years.
    Mr. Stull recently divorced. Anyone care to ask why? Here’s a clue… He’s endorsed by Ramos.

    I guess I can stop there.
    So please bear that in mind when you vote for Judge of the Superior Court Office 29.
    If you have any questions about Mr. Montgomery, his webpage is http://www.ed4judge.com/home

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published.

You may use these HTML tags and attributes: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <strike> <strong>