iePolitics: What does the Sun owe to county politicians?

I will not publish the Sun‘s endorsements here.  You will have to look for them yourself.  I am completely disgusted with them.  You can tell there was no point in challengers even bothering to show up.

For a paper that sometimes rails against county corruption, one would think all Board of Supervisors-appointed incumbents would be looked at as suspect.  But the paper is endorsing incumbents across the board, except maybe superintendent as that has yet to be announced.  Instead of being a watchdog for the public, it has become a lapdog for the Board of Supervisors and appointed officials.

So, what we all want to know Frank Pine, what does Mike Ramos have on you?  Give it 60 days and you will so regret succumbing to threats rather than giving your readers the truth.  You know we are right.  You have been given evidence of the truth and have chosen to ignore it.  Shame on you.

5 thoughts on “iePolitics: What does the Sun owe to county politicians?

  1. Don’t you get it, Mikey/Pauly/Gayry sittin’ in Frank’s Pine tree K-I-S-S-I-N-G!

  2. “(the sun) it has become a lapdog for the Board of Supervisors and appointed officials” Who do you think pulls the strings in the media in the IE? As long ago, as 1995 (and probably before that) the Sun has biased themselves with the BOS.
    The Press Enterprise tries to be non-biased,

  3. In order for the unlawful activity of our corrupt officials to remain hidden, Supervisor Neil Derry employed George Watson. Ask Derry, why he refuses to speak with me.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published.

You may use these HTML tags and attributes: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <strike> <strong>